Series 63 practice questionmediumDe Minimis Exemption Calculation
A firm with no offices in State M has 4 non-institutional clients and 2 insurance companies as clients in State M. Under the USA, must the firm register in State M?
- ANo, because only the non-institutional clients count toward the de minimis exemption✓ Correct answer
- BYes, because the total number of clients exceeds 5
- CYes, because insurance companies count as retail clients
- DYes, because every institutional client counts twice
Explanation
Why A — No, because only the non-institutional clients count toward the de minimis exemption
With no place of business in State M, the adviser remains within the de minimis exemption because it has only four non-institutional clients there. The insurance-company clients are institutional clients and do not defeat the exemption.
Turn it into reps
Reading one answer is not the same as being ready
Lucky the Banker is a free practice app with 1,051+ Series 63 questions, weak-area tracking, and timed mock exams. No credit card, no paywall.
Spot an error in this question or explanation? Tell us — we fix these fast.
Related Regulation of Investment Advisers questions
- Which of the following advisers is eligible to register only with a state (not the SEC) under the USA?
- A federal covered adviser with clients in State F has not solicited or conducted business with the general public in…
- Firm XYZ registered as an IA in State G ceases to exist due to corporate restructuring and is succeeded by a new…
- An IA is registered in State T and has no office in State S. It provides advice to 3 non-institutional clients in State…
- A state-registered investment adviser reports $112 million of regulatory assets under management on its annual Form ADV…
- ABC Advisors has a single office in State Q, provides advice only to residents of State Q, and manages $90 million in…
- A federal covered adviser located in State D has only insurance company and investment company clients in State E.…
- Which of the following is TRUE regarding dual registration of investment advisers under the USA?
