Series 63 practice questionhardPreorganization Subscription—Multiple States
A promoter seeks preorganization subscriptions in three states, collecting 8 subscribers in each state (20 total, no payments collected). Which is TRUE under the USA?
- AThe exemption is lost in all states because total subscribers exceed 10
- BThe exemption applies in each state because no more than 10 subscribers are in any one state✓ Correct answer
- CThe exemption applies only if all 20 subscribers are institutions
- DThe exemption applies if no payments are collected in any state, regardless of number of subscribers
Explanation
Why B — The exemption applies in each state because no more than 10 subscribers are in any one state
The 10-subscriber limit applies per state, not in aggregate (USA 402(b)(2)), so the exemption is preserved in each state with no more than 10 subscribers. The other options confuse the state-by-state application.
Turn it into reps
Reading one answer is not the same as being ready
Lucky the Banker is a free practice app with 1,051+ Series 63 questions, weak-area tracking, and timed mock exams. No credit card, no paywall.
Spot an error in this question or explanation? Tell us — we fix these fast.
Related Regulation of Securities & Issuers questions
- Which statement best describes the application of antifraud provisions to exempt institutional transactions under the…
- Which statement correctly describes the Administrator’s power over transactional exemptions under the 1956 Uniform…
- Under the Uniform Securities Act (USA), when must a prospectus be delivered to a purchaser in a registered offering?
- A State X registered agent emails a private placement offer to a list of 15 non-institutional prospects obtained from a…
- Which of the following BEST defines 'material information' under the USA?
- Which of the following actions can a state Administrator take regarding a Regulation D offering in their state?
- An issuer who has registered securities in a state under the USA must:
- A state Administrator issues a stop order against an issuer's registration statement after discovering that the…
