Series 63 practice questionmediumCivil Liability — Material Omission
A seller offers a security by omitting a material fact, the buyer does not know of the omission, and the seller cannot prove that reasonable care would not have revealed it. What remedy may the buyer seek under the USA?
- ARescission while the buyer owns the security, or statutory damages if it has been sold✓ Correct answer
- BOnly criminal imprisonment of the seller
- CAutomatic punitive damages with no civil action
- DNo remedy unless the Administrator first revokes the security's registration
Explanation
Why A — Rescission while the buyer owns the security, or statutory damages if it has been sold
Section 410 gives the buyer a civil remedy for a sale made through a material misstatement or omission when the buyer lacked knowledge and the seller cannot establish the statutory reasonable-care defense. The remedy is generally rescission if the security is still owned or statutory damages if it was sold.
Turn it into reps
Reading one answer is not the same as being ready
Lucky the Banker is a free practice app with 1,051+ Series 63 questions, weak-area tracking, and timed mock exams. No credit card, no paywall.
Spot an error in this question or explanation? Tell us — we fix these fast.
Related Remedies & Administrative Provisions questions
- A banker intentionally withholds a material negative fact while offering a security, but the client does not buy. Which…
- A William Blair agent delegates a sales presentation to a junior colleague, aware the colleague routinely omits key…
- A client was sold an unregistered, non-exempt security in State Y and the agent promptly offers rescission before the…
- A banker negligently fails to review updated financials and repeats outdated, inaccurate statements to a client. The…
- A seller realizes that a security was sold in violation of the USA and sends a written rescission offer to the buyer.…
- During a client presentation, a junior banker intentionally withholds negative information about a recommended…
- An investor discovers an agent's fraudulent misrepresentation three years after sale but files suit within one year of…
- Which omission is LEAST likely to be considered fraudulent under the Uniform Securities Act?
