Series 63 practice questionhardStatute of Limitations — Tolling
Absent a separate state tolling rule, a buyer discovers a violation four years after the securities sale. What result follows under the NASAA-updated 1956 USA Section 410(f)?
- AThe action is timely whenever discovery occurs
- BThe Section 410 action is barred because the three-year outside period after the sale has expired✓ Correct answer
- CThere is never a limitation period for a minor
- DThe buyer automatically receives two additional years
Explanation
Why B — The Section 410 action is barred because the three-year outside period after the sale has expired
The model provision bars a Section 410 action at the earlier of three years after the sale or two years after discovery. Tolling based on minority depends on separately applicable state law and should not be presented as a uniform rule supplied by Section 410 itself.
Turn it into reps
Reading one answer is not the same as being ready
Lucky the Banker is a free practice app with 1,051+ Series 63 questions, weak-area tracking, and timed mock exams. No credit card, no paywall.
Spot an error in this question or explanation? Tell us — we fix these fast.
Related Remedies & Administrative Provisions questions
- A broker-dealer and agent are jointly sued for a securities violation. The agent settles out of court and pays the full…
- A client receives both interest and dividends from an illegal securities sale. Under USA civil liability rules, which…
- Under the Uniform Securities Act, criminal liability applies to persons who:
- An agent in State Z made an illegal sale. The Administrator discovers this two years later, but the client has already…
- An investor who bought an unregistered security sells it to an unrelated third party before discovering the violation.…
- A buyer still owns a security purchased in a transaction covered by USA Section 410(a). What is the statutory buyer…
- An agent in State Y inadvertently sells an unregistered, non-exempt security believing it was exempt. Which of the…
- Which of the following best distinguishes contribution from indemnification under the USA?
