Series 63 practice questionhardAdministrative Procedures — Hearing Procedures Scenario
An investment adviser receives notice that the Administrator intends to revoke its registration. The adviser requests a hearing. At the hearing, the Administrator introduces evidence that the adviser misappropriated client funds. The adviser denies the allegations. After the hearing, the Administrator revokes the registration. The adviser's next course of action would be to:
- ARequest a second hearing before the same Administrator
- BAppeal to the SEC for a de novo review of the facts
- CFile for judicial review in the appropriate state court within the time allowed by state law✓ Correct answer
- DFile a complaint with NASAA to overturn the Administrator's decision
Explanation
Why C — File for judicial review in the appropriate state court within the time allowed by state law
Under USA Section 411, a person aggrieved by a final order of the Administrator may seek judicial review by filing an action in the appropriate state court. The court reviews the record to determine whether the Administrator's findings were supported by evidence and the order was lawful. There is no appeal to the SEC or NASAA from a state administrative order.
Turn it into reps
Reading one answer is not the same as being ready
Lucky the Banker is a free practice app with 646+ Series 63 questions, weak-area tracking, and timed mock exams. No credit card, no paywall.
Related Remedies & Administrative Provisions questions
- In a state-law practice set, a candidate reviews the following scenario. Prioritize the registration trigger and ignore…
- Under what circumstances may the Administrator issue a summary order suspending a registration without a prior hearing?
- For a mock NASAA exam, assume the administrator is testing this exact point. Prioritize the registration trigger and…
- A state Administrator adopts a rule that directly conflicts with a provision of the Securities Act of 1933. Which of…