An investment adviser receives notice that the Administrator intends to revoke its registration. The adviser requests a hearing. At the hearing, the Administrator introduces evidence that the adviser misappropriated client funds. The adviser denies the allegations. After the hearing, the Administrator revokes the registration. The adviser's next course of action would be to:

1. ARequest a second hearing before the same Administrator
2. BAppeal to the SEC for a de novo review of the facts
3. CFile for judicial review in the appropriate state court within the time allowed by state law✓ Correct answer
4. DFile a complaint with NASAA to overturn the Administrator's decision

Reading one answer is not the same as being ready

Lucky the Banker is a free practice app with 1,051+ Series 63 questions, weak-area tracking, and timed mock exams. No credit card, no paywall.

• Under what circumstances may the Administrator issue a summary order suspending a registration without a prior hearing?
• A state Administrator adopts a rule that directly conflicts with a provision of the Securities Act of 1933. Which of…
• The Uniform Securities Act encourages cooperation between state Administrators by allowing them to:
• The Administrator may require registered broker-dealers and investment advisers to:
• Under the USA, when a non-resident broker-dealer registers in a state, it is deemed to have:
• A broker-dealer whose registration was revoked by the Administrator may seek judicial review by:
• Before the Administrator can deny a registration application, the applicant must be:
• A broker-dealer employee discovers that his firm is operating without proper state registration. He immediately reports…