Series 63 practice questionhardCriminal Penalties — Knowledge Defense
In a criminal prosecution for securities fraud, the defendant claims he relied in good faith on legal advice from his attorney. This defense:
- AAutomatically eliminates criminal liability
- BMay negate the element of willfulness if the reliance was reasonable and in good faith✓ Correct answer
- CIs irrelevant because ignorance of the law is never a defense
- DShifts the criminal liability to the attorney who provided the advice
Explanation
Why B — May negate the element of willfulness if the reliance was reasonable and in good faith
In criminal prosecutions under USA Section 409, the prosecution must prove willfulness. Good faith reliance on competent legal counsel may negate the willfulness element, but the reliance must be genuine and reasonable. The defendant bears the burden of demonstrating the advice was sought and followed in good faith.
Turn it into reps
Reading one answer is not the same as being ready
Lucky the Banker is a free practice app with 646+ Series 63 questions, weak-area tracking, and timed mock exams. No credit card, no paywall.
Related Remedies & Administrative Provisions questions
- A broker-dealer employee discovers that his firm is operating without proper state registration. He immediately reports…
- A person who violates the USA may be subject to:
- Before the Administrator can deny a registration application, the applicant must be:
- Janet, an unregistered agent, deliberately sold unregistered securities to elderly investors using forged prospectuses.…