Series 63 practice questionhardProhibited Practices — Scenario
In a state-administrator case study, the scenario starts here. Treat the facts as a straight Series 63 application question. Agent Priya opens a joint investment account with her customer, Mrs. Chen. Priya contributes 20% of the capital but negotiates a 50% share of any profits. Which violations, if any, has Priya committed?
- ANo violation, because both parties agreed to the arrangement
- BA violation only if the broker-dealer was not notified
- CA violation only if the account loses money
- DA violation for sharing in a customer's account disproportionate to her financial contribution✓ Correct answer
Explanation
Why D — A violation for sharing in a customer's account disproportionate to her financial contribution
Under NASAA model rules, an agent may share in profits and losses of a customer's account only with proper written authorization and only in proportion to the agent's financial contribution to the account. Priya contributed 20% of the capital but negotiated a 50% profit share, which is disproportionate. This arrangement is prohibited regardless of customer consent or broker-dealer notification. The governing USA principle is unchanged even though the framing is different.
Turn it into reps
Reading one answer is not the same as being ready
Lucky the Banker is a free practice app with 646+ Series 63 questions, weak-area tracking, and timed mock exams. No credit card, no paywall.
Related Regulation of Broker-Dealers & Agents questions
- In a state-law practice set, a candidate reviews the following scenario. Focus on what changes once the scenario is…
- For a licensing checkpoint quiz, treat the following as the opening fact pattern. Treat the facts as a straight Series…
- For a mock NASAA exam, assume the administrator is testing this exact point. Focus on what changes once the scenario is…
- During a registration workshop, the instructor adds this setup first. Treat the facts as a straight Series 63…