🏦LTB
← Series 79: Section 4
Series 79 practice questionhardAnti-Money Laundering in IB Context

An investment bank is engaged to advise on a leveraged buyout. During due diligence, the deal team discovers that the acquiring entity is a series of nested shell companies domiciled in jurisdictions known for bank secrecy, and the ultimate beneficial owner cannot be identified. What is the firm's primary obligation under AML regulations?

  1. AProceed with the engagement since AML rules do not apply to M&A advisory mandates
  2. BComplete the transaction first and then conduct a retroactive AML review
  3. CEscalate the matter to the firm's AML compliance officer for enhanced due diligence and consider filing a SAR if suspicions cannot be resolved✓ Correct answer
  4. DContact the acquiring entity's law firm and rely on their assurance that the structure is legitimate
Explanation

Why C — Escalate the matter to the firm's AML compliance officer for enhanced due diligence and consider filing a SAR if suspicions cannot be resolved

When red flags arise during an engagement, such as opaque ownership structures involving secrecy jurisdictions and unidentifiable beneficial owners, the firm must escalate the matter to its AML compliance officer for enhanced due diligence under the firm's Customer Identification Program (CIP) and Customer Due Diligence (CDD) obligations. If the suspicious circumstances cannot be adequately resolved, the firm should file a SAR with FinCEN. Proceeding without resolving AML concerns or relying on third-party assurances would expose the firm to significant regulatory and legal risk.

Turn it into reps

Reading one answer is not the same as being ready

Lucky the Banker is a free practice app with 477+ Series 79 questions, weak-area tracking, and timed mock exams. No credit card, no paywall.

Practice Series 79 freeSeries 79 exam guide
Related Section 4 questions