Series 79 practice questionmediumTerminal Value Calculation
If an analyst uses a perpetuity growth rate of 5% in the terminal value calculation for a US-based company, what concern should a senior banker raise?
- AThe growth rate is too low to capture the company's potential
- BThe perpetuity growth rate must always be zero
- CThe growth rate should match the company's historical revenue CAGR
- D5% exceeds long-term nominal GDP and implies unrealistic perpetual outgrowth✓ Correct answer
Explanation
Why D — 5% exceeds long-term nominal GDP and implies unrealistic perpetual outgrowth
A perpetuity growth rate of 5% is generally considered too high for a terminal value calculation because it exceeds the long-term nominal GDP growth rate of the US (typically assumed at 2-3%). Using a growth rate above GDP implies the company will continuously gain market share indefinitely and eventually become larger than the entire economy, which is mathematically impossible. Standard practice is to use a terminal growth rate between 2-3% for US companies, roughly in line with expected long-term nominal GDP growth.
Turn it into reps
Reading one answer is not the same as being ready
Lucky the Banker is a free practice app with 995+ Series 79 questions, weak-area tracking, and timed mock exams. No credit card, no paywall.
Spot an error in this question or explanation? Tell us — we fix these fast.
Related Collection, Analysis & Evaluation of Data questions
- In an accretion/dilution analysis, a transaction is considered accretive to the acquirer when:
- An investment banker uses the exit multiple method to calculate terminal value. If the Year 5 projected EBITDA is $150…
- An acquirer with a P/E ratio of 20x acquires a target with a P/E ratio of 12x in an all-stock transaction at the…
- Using the Gordon Growth Model (perpetuity growth method), terminal value is calculated as FCF x (1 + g) / (WACC - g).…
- An investment banker is modeling a $500 million all-cash acquisition. The acquirer will finance the deal with new debt…
- In a DCF model, the terminal value captures:
- Which of the following would make an all-stock acquisition MORE likely to be dilutive to the acquirer's EPS?
- All else being equal, if a company increases its proportion of debt financing, what is the expected impact on WACC?
