Series 79 practice questioneasyPrecedent Transaction Analysis
What is the primary difference between a comparable company analysis and a precedent transaction analysis?
- AComparable company analysis uses private companies while precedent transactions use public companies
- BComparable company analysis uses forward multiples while precedent transactions use trailing multiples
- CThere is no meaningful difference; both methods produce the same valuation
- DPrecedent transaction multiples typically include a control premium paid in past M&A deals, while comparable company multiples reflect minority trading values✓ Correct answer
Explanation
Why D — Precedent transaction multiples typically include a control premium paid in past M&A deals, while comparable company multiples reflect minority trading values
The key distinction is that precedent transaction multiples embed the control premiums that acquirers paid to gain control of target companies. These premiums typically range from 20-40% above the pre-deal trading price. Comparable company analysis, by contrast, reflects the value of a minority stake based on current public market trading levels. As a result, precedent transaction analysis generally produces higher valuations than trading comps.
Turn it into reps
Reading one answer is not the same as being ready
Lucky the Banker is a free practice app with 477+ Series 79 questions, weak-area tracking, and timed mock exams. No credit card, no paywall.
Related Collection, Analysis & Evaluation of Data questions
- An investment banker is conducting a precedent transaction analysis for a mid-cap healthcare company. Which of the…
- In a comparable company analysis, calendarization is performed to:
- An analyst identifies five precedent transactions with EV/EBITDA multiples of 12.0x, 13.5x, 11.0x, 15.0x, and 9.5x. The…
- An analyst is building a comparable company analysis and must choose between using LTM (last twelve months) and NTM…