Series 63 practice questionmediumCivil Liabilities — Seller's Defense
An agent sold an unregistered security to a client. In a civil action by the client, the agent claims he did not know the security was unregistered. This defense is:
- AValid — the agent is not liable if he was unaware of the registration status
- BValid only if the agent can prove the broker-dealer told him the security was registered
- CInvalid — liability for selling unregistered securities is absolute regardless of the seller's knowledge✓ Correct answer
- DValid only if the agent has fewer than 2 years of experience in the industry
Explanation
Why C — Invalid — liability for selling unregistered securities is absolute regardless of the seller's knowledge
Under USA Section 410(a), liability for selling unregistered, non-exempt securities is a strict liability provision. The seller's lack of knowledge that the security was unregistered is not a defense. However, Section 410(b) does provide a defense of not knowing for fraud-based claims.
Turn it into reps
Reading one answer is not the same as being ready
Lucky the Banker is a free practice app with 646+ Series 63 questions, weak-area tracking, and timed mock exams. No credit card, no paywall.
Related Remedies & Administrative Provisions questions
- An agent and his employing broker-dealer both participated in a fraudulent securities sale. Under the USA, the client…
- An investor purchased 500 shares of XYZ Corp at $20 per share based on fraudulent misrepresentations by her agent. She…
- A person sells a security that should have been registered but was not. The buyer's primary civil remedy under the USA…
- A client purchased a security based on material misrepresentations made by her agent. If the client still owns the…