Series 79 practice questionhardComparable Company Analysis
An analyst notices that one comparable company trades at an EV/EBITDA multiple significantly above its peers. Upon investigation, the analyst discovers the company recently received a takeover bid. How should the analyst handle this situation?
- AInclude the company at its current trading multiple to reflect market conditions
- BExclude the company or note it separately, as its multiple reflects a control premium rather than intrinsic trading value✓ Correct answer
- CAverage the company's pre-bid and post-bid multiples
- DReplace the company with a non-public comparable
Explanation
Why B — Exclude the company or note it separately, as its multiple reflects a control premium rather than intrinsic trading value
When a comparable company's stock price has been inflated by a takeover bid, its trading multiple no longer reflects the market's view of standalone intrinsic value. Including it would bias the comps analysis upward. The standard practice is to either exclude the company from the peer set or present it separately with a footnote explaining the control premium embedded in its trading price. This maintains the integrity of the comparable company analysis as a measure of standalone trading value.
Turn it into reps
Reading one answer is not the same as being ready
Lucky the Banker is a free practice app with 477+ Series 79 questions, weak-area tracking, and timed mock exams. No credit card, no paywall.
Related Collection, Analysis & Evaluation of Data questions
- Which of the following is the most commonly used enterprise value multiple in comparable company analysis?
- When conducting a comparable company analysis, which of the following criteria is LEAST important in selecting peer…
- An investment banker is valuing a SaaS company with no positive EBITDA. Which valuation multiple would be most…
- An investment banker selects five comparable companies with EV/EBITDA multiples of 8.0x, 9.5x, 10.2x, 11.0x, and 14.5x.…