Lucky the Banker mascotLTB
Series 79: M&A, Tender Offers & Restructuring
Series 79 practice questionhardFairness Opinions

An investment bank serving as both financial advisor and provider of a fairness opinion in a merger stands to receive a significant success fee contingent on deal completion. Which of the following best describes the primary concern with this arrangement?

  1. AThe arrangement is illegal under the Williams Act
  2. BContingent fee may undermine fairness-opinion independence✓ Correct answer
  3. CThe investment bank must waive its advisory fee to issue the opinion
  4. DThe SEC must pre-approve all fairness opinion fee arrangements
Explanation

Why BContingent fee may undermine fairness-opinion independence

When the financial advisor providing the fairness opinion has a contingent fee tied to deal completion, there is an inherent conflict of interest because the advisor has a financial incentive to opine that the deal is fair. This conflict must be disclosed in the proxy statement or tender offer documents. Some boards mitigate this by engaging a separate, independent financial advisor solely to render the fairness opinion, though this practice is not legally required in all jurisdictions.

Turn it into reps

Reading one answer is not the same as being ready

Lucky the Banker is a free practice app with 995+ Series 79 questions, weak-area tracking, and timed mock exams. No credit card, no paywall.

Spot an error in this question or explanation? Tell us — we fix these fast.

Related M&A, Tender Offers & Restructuring questions