An underwriter is establishing its due diligence defense for a $300 million IPO. Which of the following steps would NOT typically be part of the due diligence process?
- AReviewing the company's material contracts, financial statements, and corporate records
- BConducting management interviews and site visits to the company's facilities
- CIndependently auditing the company's financial statements in addition to the external auditor's audit✓ Correct answer
- DObtaining comfort letters from the company's independent auditors and legal opinions from the company's counsel
Why C — Independently auditing the company's financial statements in addition to the external auditor's audit
While underwriters must conduct a thorough investigation, they are entitled to rely on the work of experts (such as the independent auditor) for 'expertised' portions of the registration statement, including the audited financial statements. The underwriter is not expected to independently re-audit the financial statements. The due diligence standard for expertised portions is that the underwriter had no reasonable ground to believe the expertised statements were untrue. For non-expertised portions, the underwriter must conduct its own reasonable investigation, including document review, management interviews, and obtaining comfort letters.
Reading one answer is not the same as being ready
Lucky the Banker is a free practice app with 477+ Series 79 questions, weak-area tracking, and timed mock exams. No credit card, no paywall.
- In the context of due diligence, what is a '10b-5 letter'?
- What is the 'due diligence defense' under Section 11 of the Securities Act?
- Under Section 11 of the Securities Act, which of the following parties can be held liable for material misstatements in…
- A company is conducting a Regulation A+ Tier 2 offering of $50 million. What is the company's blue sky compliance…