Lucky the Banker mascotLTB
Series 79: Underwriting & New Financing
Series 79 practice questionhardDue Diligence Defense

An underwriter is named as a defendant in a lawsuit under Section 11 of the Securities Act due to a material misstatement in the registration statement. Which of the following actions could best establish a due diligence defense for the underwriter?

  1. AEvidence of reasonable investigation, including diligence and reasonable reliance on experts✓ Correct answer
  2. BShowing it delegated the investigation to the issuer's legal counsel and reviewed their summary reports.
  3. CEstablishing that it had previously underwritten another offering for the issuer without incident.
  4. DProving that it was unaware of the misstatement because it trusted the issuer's management.
Explanation

Why AEvidence of reasonable investigation, including diligence and reasonable reliance on experts

The due diligence defense requires an underwriter to show it made a reasonable investigation and believed the statements were true. Simply relying on others or past experience is insufficient, making option A correct. The trap is thinking that reliance on counsel or management alone meets the standard, when active investigation is required.

Turn it into reps

Reading one answer is not the same as being ready

Lucky the Banker is a free practice app with 995+ Series 79 questions, weak-area tracking, and timed mock exams. No credit card, no paywall.

Spot an error in this question or explanation? Tell us — we fix these fast.

Related Underwriting & New Financing questions