Lucky the Banker mascotLTB
Series 79: Underwriting & New Financing
Series 79 practice questionhardDue Diligence Defense

An underwriter is named in a registration statement and is being sued under Section 11 of the Securities Act after a material misstatement is discovered post-offering. The underwriter claims a due diligence defense. Which of the following would most likely undermine the underwriter's defense?

  1. AThe underwriter failed to interview the issuer's key suppliers despite known concerns about supply chain reliability.✓ Correct answer
  2. BThe underwriter reviewed all audited financial statements and held discussions with management.
  3. CThe underwriter obtained a comfort letter from the issuer's independent auditor.
  4. DThe underwriter attended the management presentation and reviewed publicly available information.
Explanation

Why AThe underwriter failed to interview the issuer's key suppliers despite known concerns about supply chain reliability.

Failing to follow up on known areas of concern, such as not interviewing key suppliers, suggests the underwriter did not conduct a 'reasonable investigation.' Passive reliance on management or auditors alone does not suffice for due diligence; missing red flags is a common trap.

Turn it into reps

Reading one answer is not the same as being ready

Lucky the Banker is a free practice app with 995+ Series 79 questions, weak-area tracking, and timed mock exams. No credit card, no paywall.

Spot an error in this question or explanation? Tell us — we fix these fast.

Related Underwriting & New Financing questions