How does Section 12(a)(1) liability differ from Section 11 liability?
- A12(a)(1): Section 5 sale violations; Section 11: registration statement misstatements✓ Correct answer
- BSection 12(a)(1) applies only to secondary market transactions
- CSection 12(a)(1) has a longer statute of limitations than Section 11
- DSection 12(a)(1) applies only to fraud, while Section 11 applies to negligence
Why A — 12(a)(1): Section 5 sale violations; Section 11: registration statement misstatements
Section 12(a)(1) creates strict liability for any person who offers or sells a security in violation of Section 5's registration requirements (i.e., selling unregistered securities without an applicable exemption). The remedy is rescission (the buyer can demand their money back). Section 11, by contrast, applies to registered offerings where the registration statement contains material misstatements or omissions. Section 12(a)(1) does not require proof of materiality or reliance; the mere violation of the registration requirement is sufficient for liability.
Reading one answer is not the same as being ready
Lucky the Banker is a free practice app with 995+ Series 79 questions, weak-area tracking, and timed mock exams. No credit card, no paywall.
Spot an error in this question or explanation? Tell us — we fix these fast.
- What is the statute of limitations for claims under Section 11 of the Securities Act?
- An investor purchases 10,000 shares at the $22 IPO price. The stock declines to $14 after it is revealed that the…
- During which period is the quiet period restriction most significant in an IPO?
- Under Section 11 of the Securities Act, which of the following parties can be held liable for material misstatements in…
- A company planning an IPO gives a presentation at an industry conference two weeks before filing its S-1. The CEO…
- In the context of due diligence, what is a '10b-5 letter'?
- Under Rule 163A, the safe harbor for pre-filing communications, what conditions must be met for an issuer's…
- An underwriter is establishing its due diligence defense for a $300 million IPO. Which of the following steps would NOT…
