Series 79 practice questionmediumMaterial Adverse Change Clauses
Which of the following would most likely NOT constitute a material adverse change (MAC) under a typical acquisition agreement?
- ALoss of a key customer representing 40% of revenue
- BDiscovery of accounting fraud at the target
- CUnforeseen regulatory ban on a major product line
- DGeneral deterioration of market conditions affecting the target's industry✓ Correct answer
Explanation
Why D — General deterioration of market conditions affecting the target's industry
MAC clauses typically carve out general industry or economy-wide effects, so general market deterioration is usually not grounds for invoking a MAC. The trap is selecting a company-specific event instead.
Turn it into reps
Reading one answer is not the same as being ready
Lucky the Banker is a free practice app with 995+ Series 79 questions, weak-area tracking, and timed mock exams. No credit card, no paywall.
Spot an error in this question or explanation? Tell us — we fix these fast.
Related M&A, Tender Offers & Restructuring questions
- A merger consideration includes a floating exchange ratio structure with a collar. If the acquirer's stock price falls…
- Which party is responsible for filing Schedule 14D-9 in connection with a tender offer?
- What is the consequence if parties to a transaction subject to HSR are found to have 'jumped the gun' by coordinating…
- A bring-down condition in an acquisition agreement requires that representations and warranties be accurate as of which…
- In structuring an LBO, which of the following is a primary source of funds for the purchase price?
- In a reverse triangular merger, which entity survives as a subsidiary post-transaction?
- In an acquisition, which provision limits the time period during which a party can make claims for breach of…
- An acquisition agreement contains a $3 million indemnity basket and a $15 million indemnity cap. After closing, the…
